Why Do Heavy, Dense Solvents Clean Better than Lighter Fluids?
Most people are familiar with the basic process of cleaning: a solvent dissolves the oil, grease, flux or some other contamination and then the contamination is rinsed away. The key is dissolving: just like sugar “dissappears” in warm water, solvents need to dissolve most contamination to remove it.
However, sometimes the contamination cannot be dissolved. In this case, dense solvents are better cleaners than lighter solvents, all other factors being equal. This is called “displacement cleaning.”
Water is heavy, but modern cleaning fluids are heavier — typically 20-30% heavier than water, and 50%+ heavier than alcohol.
Many types of contamination are not soluble, so no amount of cleaning fluid or water can remove them by dissolving them. Examples include solder balls, metal finings from grinding processes, tiny particles of dust and dirt, lint, exhaust particulate, skin cells, and many other common contaminates.
However, modern nonflammable cleaning fluids generally are much, much heavier than water. That means these fluids remove such types of contamination: they “float” the dust and grit off the surface just as a ship floats on the ocean. This means the cleaning fluids get under particulate, dissipate any static charge and lift particulate off the surface. Water and IPA both lack this capacity. Here’s how the numbers stack up:
Not-In-Kind Benchmarks
Brand Name or Description | Principle Supplier | Base Chemistry | Liquid Density (kg/liter) |
---|---|---|---|
Water | <Many> | H20 | 1.00 |
IPA Alcohol* | <Many> | Alcohol | 0.79 |
First Generation
Brand Name or Description | Principle Supplier | Base Chemistry | Liquid Density (kg/liter) |
---|---|---|---|
Trichloroethylene (TCE) | <Many> | Chlorine | 1.46 |
Perchloroethylene (PCE or Perc) | <Many> | Chlorine | 1.62 |
Freon™ TF† | DuPont | CFC-113 | 1.57 |
Second Generation
Brand Name or Description | Principle Supplier | Base Chemistry | Liquid Density (kg/liter) |
---|---|---|---|
Genesolv® 2004† | Allied-Signal | HCFC-141b | 1.23 |
AK-225† | Asahi | HCFC-225 | 1.55 |
n-Proply Bromide (nPB) | <Many> | Bromine | 1.35 |
Third Generation
Brand Name or Description | Principle Supplier | Base Chemistry | Liquid Density (kg/liter) |
---|---|---|---|
Novec® 71DA | 3M | HFE-7100 | 1.33 |
Vertrel™ XF | Chemours | HFC-43-10 | 1.58 |
MicroCare™ HDS | MicroCare | HFC-365 | 1.32 |
Vertrel™ SFR | Chemours | Trans | 1.28 |
Fourth Generation
Brand Name or Description | Principle Supplier | Base Chemistry | Liquid Density (kg/liter) |
---|---|---|---|
Opteon™ SF79 | Chemours | MPHE | 1.28 |
Solstice® PF | Honeywell | HFO-1233zd | 1.26 |
AE-3000 | Asahi | HFE-347pc-f | 1.35 |
Disclaimer
* Indicates a flammable cleaning fluid; this usually is an ingredient in an azeotropic blend.
† Indicates a Class 1 or Class 2 ozone-depleting solvent; no longer used by environmentally responsible companies and countries; included here merely for completeness.
From this chart, one can easily see that modern, nonflammable, planet-friendly cleaning fluids are heavier than water or IPA, and therefore will generally out-perform those fluids in critical cleaning applications. When combined with other important factors, such as Kb value, toxicity, flammability and surface tension, these predict better, faster and more cost-effective cleaning.